How Can Leaders to be More Mindfulness In The Workplace?

In the world of work, I come across a lot of people who could not or difficult to be assertive. For example:

"Why I'm hard pressed to Yes, to be assertive on subordinates who was older than me?"

"I felt awful to reprimand employees who won't work overtime at a time when jobs are piling up."

"Well, I dare not speak for what it is to other parts. I was afraid people were offended and angry when hearing what I tell them ... "

"I was kind of a difficult person to talk loud or angry. So, the firm is indeed not my power. "

A variety of these comments reflect how difficult it is for some (or many) people to be assertive, but these difficulties ultimately will harm himself. Many people argue that unequivocal attitude can only be realized by putting up a cool face and less friendly or speaking out loud/angry. Is it true? Whether it be assertive means need to rant, suggesting a tense facial expressions, ordered others with loud, or certain objects are hit/Slam, so that other people take seriously our greeting and then follow it? Let's see, what is actually meant by "firm"?

 This How Can Leaders to be More Mindfulness In The Workplace?

The second of these same words at a glance, from the basic "right". The busy world of business, politics and the world of the professional qualities of a leader. Leaders who don't eling will often get stuck in the understanding of justification and truth seem to have the same dimensions.

What indeed that gives different nuance of justification and truth?

The first point, the justification of subjective sourced. A leader when facing various problems and phenomena are often lost control and his composure. Leaders like this will easily hooked into not objective and easy to get carried away by the current. The leader are easily controlled atmosphere, controlled by private interests nor his group so as not to be able to see the truth of the matter and stuck to find justification. Take a look at what happens to a brawl between the school, the brawl between village, and block-blokan between one group of party with a group of other parties. The bottom line is the same with Office politics that gave rise to kubu kubu likes and dislikes. In the case of a brawl, pure, we see that the problem shifted from trivial incidents into betting pride/ego.

When the ego talk then justification appears. The ego is so expensive so there are always casualties in every time a brawl ensued. On a larger scale egos incarnate into the terror that could be based on the primordial justification justification as a justification against the background of the tribe (remember the fuss in the city of Ambon group), religious background (this is in fact already very often), or political background. And that wretched, is on display to the public, may the children of the nation the next generation we do not mimic this behavior. When it's based justification, then as if all legitimate in the name of Holiness groups.

Small in scale, in the household, we witness a case of DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, divorce and a variety of other household case was also based on justification. Listen to the one individual ego talking. Is justification, sometimes things that are not relevant to participate in the debate. Issues that have already buried so long participated is lifted when the ego talking. In the Office, a leader who is not going to be using subjektifitas eling in seeing problems and assess his subordinates that ultimately emerged the term "first rule: boss is never wrong. The second rule: If the boss is wrong, see first rule ".

Justification keep us from solving problems. Why? Because the justification of keep us from the truth. Why is this so? Let's get on to the second point.

The second point, the truth always are objective. Eling leaders always put his ego in the face of all the problems and phenomena. With a capital of eling, a leader of peace such as mountains and lucidity like water and always presenting solutions as fresh as the dew in the morning. A leader always eling separating problems with the subject so that a leader who can freely seek eling root problem by using norms problem solving. In a more succinct sentences I say that leaders who eling when separating the subject and object of the problem will be able to apply the search root of the problem by relying on interrelated causes for cause, this is because of that is. This universal law applies to all phenomena. Not only in the business world, the world of Science (Science), in the world of religion though the phenomenon is proven to remain valid. When we are able to tap into all the phenomenon objectively, we are spared from ketergesa-gesaan to find justification. Justification always starts from the word "Anyway". Anyway, this should have to be so. This word clog creativity, fresh morning dew clog to emerge from the mind of a leader.

The third point, the justification of childish attitude gave rise and eliminate the maturity. Check out when people started using justification in any evidence. Logically work upside down. Instead of tracing the roots of the problem and then look for the solution, justification always starting from the first solution recently searched for a way to connect all of the phenomena, the evidence to support the solution. If this constantly happens, I say that such leaders are using the "sunglasses" everywhere he's been. All dark in front of his eyes and he didn't feel when now being ablaze. That wretched he always was convinced the world was dark instead of removing the glass eyes. So it's no wonder, many leaders who dared yell-yell out loud that the world is a dark and invites everyone to trust this dark world, without him first put her dark glasses. It would be sad! Leaders like this will be very self-centric and often budeg alias cannot listen to others and can not be viewed from the perspective of others.

The fourth point, the leader who consistently shows a mature eling. Eling leaders put the issue on the table, and invites all individuals viewed the matter objectively and jointly assess and solve the problem. Leaders like this will give the opportunity for all members to become adults in problem solving. Although leaders of the tau direct solutions to solve the problem, but the leaders will always provide opportunity eling so that everyone is trained to look at all things objectively, because in this way the leader eling will bear other eling leader.

Last point: the justification of bringing black and white ego, truth dare accept all colors. Leaders who do not always caught between eling two poles of right and wrong or black and white. For him, only two possibilities in an issue or phenomenon namely 0 and 1. Basically, all the problems always have so many variables and legal reasons for each are suspended (this is because of that is) outlines that the thread puzzler of a phenomenon shall be described with clarity and calmness. With a calmness and clarity, we can draw the root of the problem. Interestingly is a solution of these issues can be very colorful are the same as the reason for the problem which is also colorful. The courage not to apply logic streotypist is required. We are in a society that is already too long stuck in a logic of perception that stereotype. We often judge people because of his education, his background, his religion, the color of his skin and all other forms of primordial. As a result, we often become too easy to stereotype of a phenomenon. Basic Lout! It concluded if we're developing stereotypist. Waste treatment with herbal medicine could overcome the symptoms in order for eling, or when it is too late for these diseases will make your moral need amputees.

Let's learn eling, learning not to get caught up in the justification, and learn to be objective in an attempt to find the truth.